One-third of all link clicks on Facebook already go to its self-hosted Instant Articles. Facebook claims they drive more referral traffic click-for-click because people don’t abandon them mid-click as they do with slow-loading mobile websites. Now Facebook is teaming up with Nielsen to prove that individual publishers benefit when they post with the Instant Articles format.Today Facebook is launching an analytics comparison tool for Instant Articles publishers. It looks at the referral traffic from a test group of people who see Instant Article versions of links, and a control group that sees mobile web versions. Facebook hopes publishers will see for themselves that they get more traffic from Instant Articles. The tool is now rolling out to publishers who’ve posted enough of both formats, and Facebook plans to add more metrics to the tool in the future.
Facebook says that, on average, here’s how much more people click and read Instant Articles over mobile web in different parts of the world:
- U.S. and Canada click and read over 25 percent more
- Europe clicks and reads over 30 percent more
- Middle East and North Africa click and read 80 percent more
- Southeast Asia reads and clicks 60 percent more
- Latin America reads and clicks 60 percent more
- India reads and clicks over 75 percent more
- That leaves out of whether these Instant Articles monetize better. That’s something that publishers are increasingly worried about — and with good reason.
Facebook launched Instant Articles in 2015 with a sterilized style, tons of restrictions on how many ads they could show and no way to include subscription purchase, newsletter sign-up or recirculation units that drive revenue. That year, I warned publishers they risked becoming ghostwriters feeding dumb content into Facebook’s smart pipe, with no differentiation between publishers or opportunities to build long-term relationships with loyal readers. You can watch my rant about the problem below.
Post a Comment